Whose Social Europe? - The Laval/Viking Judgments and the Prosperity Gap

6 Pages Posted: 5 Apr 2011 Last revised: 13 Dec 2012

See all articles by Damjan Kukovec

Damjan Kukovec

Middlesex University - School of Law

Date Written: April 16, 2010


The paper explores and critiques the current consciousness in the EU legal academia and legal profession when thinking about rights and free movement and about the relationship between Eastern and Western Europe. It shows the foreclosure of the development concerns in the discourse of the European Court of Justice in the Laval judgment and argues that the current perception of the dichotomy between rights and free movement is inadequate in EU legal thinking and in legal discourse in general. It shows an important imbalance between the rhetoric of goods dumping and social dumping in EU legal discourse. Furthermore, I argue that the language of free movement sometimes actually helps the weak and therefore remain skeptical about the EU legal profession's optimism about the introduction of social rights in the EU Charter of Rights.

Keywords: Laval, Dichotomy, Social and Free Movement, Social Dumping, Goods Dumping, Central Europe, Social Rights, Charter of Rights, European Union, European Court of Justice

Suggested Citation

Kukovec, Damjan, Whose Social Europe? - The Laval/Viking Judgments and the Prosperity Gap (April 16, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1800922 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1800922

Damjan Kukovec (Contact Author)

Middlesex University - School of Law ( email )

The Burroughs
WG 11
London, NW4 4BT
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics