The Speedy Trial Rights of Military Detainees

Walter E. Kuhn

April 5, 2011

Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 62, 2011

The hybrid nature of the War on Terror is testing the limits of the Speedy Trial and Due Process Clauses. Former military detainees have been convicted in federal court years after their crimes and capture. Setting aside the wisdom of civilian detainee trials, they have thus far proven consistent with constitutional delay protections.

The courts have correctly determined that military detention generally does not trigger the protections of the Speedy Trial Clause. Absent unusual circumstances, judicial scrutiny of delay due to military detention should occur via the Due Process Clause, which allows for operational flexibility while safeguarding against bad faith by the government. The administration should continue to try detainees when possible, with the venue depending on the nature of the case, and be mindful of the potential for precedent established in civilian detainee trials to govern ordinary criminal cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Terrorism, Guantanamo Bay, Speedy Trial, Due Process, National Security

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 10, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Kuhn, Walter E., The Speedy Trial Rights of Military Detainees (April 5, 2011). Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 62, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1803681

Contact Information

No contact information is available for Walter E. Kuhn
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 909
Downloads: 115
Download Rank: 191,816