Why is Small Business the Chief Business of Congress?

58 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2011 Last revised: 27 Nov 2012

Mirit Eyal-Cohen

University of Alabama - School of Law

Date Written: February 7, 2011

Abstract

Small business is a sacred cow in America. In 1958, Congress created the Small Business Investment Company ("SBIC"), a unique public-private program that provides long-term capital to small entrepreneurs. From its inception, however, the SBIC has been plagued by inefficiency and failure. Yet, Congress continues to pour millions of dollars into the SBIC program, with no end in sight. What explains this failed policy course?

This article argues that the SBIC program exemplifies the pitfalls of legal and political institutional path dependency and should be replaced by private institutional lending systems. Pursuant to this account, past decisions can influence future legal developments even in the face of material social change.

Political institutions can entrench ineffective paths by sustaining dynamics of "increasing returns" through processes of "positive feedbacks" and "self-reinforcement." Increasing returns occur when the benefits of a choice augment simply because over time more people opt for that choice.

Our romantic ideal of small business as an economic and social catalyst has sprouted positive cultural feedbacks. Thereafter, the establishment of the House and Senate Small Business Committees and the Small Business Administration sustained this culture, self-reinforcing the SBIC program inefficient path where we remain invested to this day.

Keywords: small business, SBA, SBIC program, Small Business Investment Company, path dependency, positive feedback, political systems, business culture, private institutional lending, self-reinforcement, policy reform, tax reform, tax breaks, tax law, entrepreneurship, minority businesses, equity gap

JEL Classification: K34, K20, H25, H81

Suggested Citation

Eyal-Cohen, Mirit, Why is Small Business the Chief Business of Congress? (February 7, 2011). Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 43, p. 1, 2012; University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-12. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1805167

Mirit Eyal-Cohen (Contact Author)

University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Rank
147,526
Abstract Views
991