Is Texas Tough on Crime but Soft on Criminal Procedure?

Adam M. Gershowitz

William & Mary Law School

April 7, 2011

American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 49, 2012
U of Houston Law Center No. 2011-A-3

Although Texas is well known for imposing tough punishments on convicted defendants, it is surprisingly generous in affording criminal procedure protections. In a variety of areas, including search and seizure rules, confession requirements, the availability of bail, discovery obligations on prosecutors, or jury trial guarantees, Texas affords protections vastly in excess of what is required by the United States Constitution. Even more shockingly, these criminal procedure guarantees come almost entirely from Texas statutes approved by the legislature, not activist rules imposed by judges. This article explores Texas's reputation as a tough-on-crime state, as well as the fact that the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is extremely favorable to criminal defendants. The article explains the seeming inconsistency between Texas being tough on crime but soft on criminal procedure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: Texas, Punitive, Countermajoritarian, Confessions, Inevitable Discovery, Bail, Discovery, Jury Trial, Jury Senctencing, Sobriety Checkpoint

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 10, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Gershowitz, Adam M., Is Texas Tough on Crime but Soft on Criminal Procedure? (April 7, 2011). American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 49, 2012; U of Houston Law Center No. 2011-A-3. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1805208

Contact Information

Adam M. Gershowitz (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 888
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 168,491