Home, Home on the Web and Other Fourth Amendment Implications of Technosocial Change
66 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2011 Last revised: 5 Jun 2011
Date Written: April 12, 2011
Abstract
The rapidly changing social role of the Internet and other digital media requires a rethinking of the scope of Fourth Amendment protection. The social role of the Internet and related technologies goes far beyond serving as a new means of communication, analogous to the telephone and postal mail. To preserve Fourth Amendment protections in the face of changing technology, courts must focus not only on the potential for increasing intrusion into time-honored private realms, as the Supreme Court did in Kyllo, but also on the privacy implications of technology-mediated social change that were recognized in Katz. First, courts should recognize that an aggressive form of third party doctrine suggesting that any exposure of private data to an intermediary destroys reasonable expectations of privacy is inconsistent with Fourth Amendment doctrine relating to shared social spaces. Second, courts should adopt an approach of technosocial continuity, acknowledging both the increasing intrusiveness that technology makes possible and the intertwined and changing social structure of the physical and digital worlds. Viewed from a technosocial perspective, much cloud computing is an extension of the home or office. Similarly, social networking platforms sometimes serve as technosocial extensions of the home, connecting people with their friends, families, and intimates and aggregating the varied pieces of private life in ways that mirror the home's valued social role. To maintain technosocial continuity with Fourth Amendment protection of traditional bastions of privacy, such as the home, courts should zoom out from a focus on translating the Fourth Amendment’s protections to cyberspace and see digitally-mediated social behavior for what it frequently is - an inextricable part of social and private life. To maintain a space for private life away from government scrutiny, the Fourth Amendment’s protections must reflect the technosocial reality of citizens' private lives.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A User's Guide to the Stored Communications Act, and a Legislator's Guide to Amending it
By Orin S. Kerr
-
Searches and Seizures in a Digital World
By Orin S. Kerr
-
The Case for the Third-Party Doctrine
By Orin S. Kerr
-
Brandeis & Warren's 'The Right to Privacy and the Birth of the Right to Privacy'
By Ben Bratman
-
Applying the Fourth Amendment to the Internet: A General Approach
By Orin S. Kerr
-
Buying You: The Government's Use of Fourth-Parties to Launder Data about 'The People'
-
Back to Katz: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in the Facebook Age