Center for Progressive Reform White Paper No. 1104
20 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2011 Last revised: 21 Aug 2012
Date Written: April 1, 2011
Over the last two decades, natural resource scientists, managers, and policymakers have increasingly endorsed “adaptive management” of land and natural resources. Indeed, this approach, based on adaptive implementation of resource management and pollution control laws, is now mandated in a variety of contexts at the federal and state level. Yet confusion remains over the meaning of adaptive management, and disagreement persists over its usefulness or feasibility in specific contexts.
This white paper is intended to help legislators, agency personnel, and the public better understand and use adaptive management. Adaptive management is not a panacea for the problems that plague natural resource management woes. It is appropriate in some contexts, but not in others. Drawing on key literature as well as case studies, we offer an explanation of adaptive management, including a discussion of its benefits and challenges; a roadmap for deciding whether or not to use it in a particular context; and best practices for obtaining its benefits while avoiding its potential pitfalls. Following these recommendations should simultaneously improve the ability of resource managers to achieve management goals determined by society and the ability of citizens to hold managers accountable to those goals.
Keywords: adaptive management
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Doremus, Holly and Andreen, William L. and Camacho, Alejandro E. and Farber, Daniel A. and Glicksman, Robert L. and Goble, Dale D. and Karkkainen, Bradley C. and Rohlf, Dan and Tarlock, A. Dan and Zellmer, Sandra B. and Jones, Shana Campbell and Huang, Ling-Yee, Making Good Use of Adaptive Management (April 1, 2011). Center for Progressive Reform White Paper No. 1104; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-24. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1808106 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808106