Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing's Antecedents: Learning from Research on Identity and Ethics Programs
Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 553-586, 2009
35 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2011
Date Written: october 13, 2009
Despite a significant increase in whistle-blowing practices in work organizations, we know little about what differentiates whistle-blowers from those who observe a wrongdoing but chose not to report it. In this review article, we first highlight the arenas in which research on whistle-blowing has produced inconsistent results and those in which the findings have been consistent. Second, we propose that the adoption of an identity approach will help clarify the inconsistent findings and extend prior work on individual-level motives behind whistle-blowing. Third, we argue that the integration of the whistle-blowing research with that on ethics programs will aid in systematically expanding our understanding of the situational antecedents of whistle-blowing. We conclude our review by discussing new theoretical and methodological arenas of research in the domain of whistle-blowing.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Toward an Understanding of Employment Discrimination Claiming: An Integration of Organizational Justice and Social Information Processing Theories
A Different Way to "Get Even" after Unjust Terminations: Remedies, Not Retaliations as a Means to Restore Organizational Justice
By Barry M. Goldman, Laura Kray, ...