'Government by Public Opinion': Bryce’s Theory of the Constitution

33 Pages Posted: 16 Apr 2011 Last revised: 9 Jul 2011

Adrian Vermeule

Harvard Law School

Date Written: April 14, 2011

Abstract

In The American Commonwealth (1888), James Bryce identified a political regime-type that he called “government by public opinion,” and argued that the United States had developed it to a greater degree than any other constitutional democracy then extant. Bryce’s analysis entails that familiar propositions about the relationship between public opinion and the constitutional order – many stemming from Publius – must be questioned, and perhaps heavily qualified or discarded. Bryce argues that the basic Madisonian strategy for channeling and containing majoritarian opinions and passions, by means of checks and balances and an extended republic, has perverse results; it strengthens rather than containing the force of public opinion. The power of mass opinion in America thus results, in part, from the very safeguards the framers put into place against it. Once in place, government by public opinion sets both a lower bound and an upper bound on the performance of the American democracy, ensuring that it performs tolerably well but also preventing it from performing better still. In Bryce’s paradoxical assessment, “the American democracy is not better just because it is so good.”

Suggested Citation

Vermeule, Adrian, 'Government by Public Opinion': Bryce’s Theory of the Constitution (April 14, 2011). Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 11-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1809794 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1809794

Adrian Vermeule (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1525 Massachusetts
Griswold 500
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
485
Rank
45,846
Abstract Views
6,508