Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Whither Arbitration?

43 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2011  

Peter B. Rutledge

University of Georgia School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: April 15, 2011


Over the past several decades, scholars and policymakers have debated the future of arbitration in the United States. Those debates have taken on new significance in the present Congress, which is considering a variety of reform proposals. Among the most widely watched are ones that would prohibit the enforcement of predispute arbitration clauses in employment, consumer and franchise contracts. Reviewing the available empirical literature, the paper explains how many of the assumptions driving the arbitration reform debate are unproven at best and flatly wrong at worst. It then tries to sketch out the economic impact of any move by Congress to limit arbitration in certain fields. The effect, I submit, would be to harm the very consumers and employees whom Congress is trying to protect. While arbitration certainly can be refined on the edges and more empirical research needs to be done, advocates for reform simply have not made their case.

Keywords: Arbitration, Alternative Dispute Resolution, ADR, Contracts

JEL Classification: K30

Suggested Citation

Rutledge, Peter B., Whither Arbitration? (April 15, 2011). Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008; UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-09. Available at SSRN: or

Peter Rutledge (Contact Author)

University of Georgia School of Law ( email )

225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Paper statistics

Abstract Views