The Rhetoric of ‘Legal Fragmentation’ and its Discontents: Evolutionary Dilemmas in the Constitutional Semantics of Global Law

28 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2011

Date Written: April 14, 2011

Abstract

This paper engages in the current debate on legal fragmentation and social inclusion from the perspective of systems theory. Its particular focus is directed at the changing patterns of social inclusion/exclusion under the condition of the emerging constitutional discourses of world law. While fragmented global law would still be able to safeguard functional differentiation, the neutralization of exclusionary dynamics is successively failing. This failure is attributed to the decline of politics in world society. A fragmented global law operates to a lesser degree in concert with national politics in order to guarantee the modern imperative towards full inclusion.

Keywords: systems theory, global constitutionalism, functional constitutionalization, global exclusion

Suggested Citation

Holmes, Pablo, The Rhetoric of ‘Legal Fragmentation’ and its Discontents: Evolutionary Dilemmas in the Constitutional Semantics of Global Law (April 14, 2011). Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, April 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1816403

Pablo Holmes (Contact Author)

University of Brasília ( email )

Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro
Asa Norte
Brasília, Distrito Federal 70910-900
Brazil
556131072220 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
544
rank
298,315
PlumX Metrics