Peoples’ Tribunals: Legitimate or Rough Justice

Posted: 21 Apr 2011

See all articles by Christine Chinkin

Christine Chinkin

London School of Economics - Law School; University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

The article examines the use of Peoples' Tribunals in seeking access to justice where none has been possible through more formal methods. It uses as illustration the Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal that sought justice for the so-called comfort women, the primarily Asian women who were subjected to sexual slavery by the Japanese military before and during World War Two. The article briefly recounts the fate of the comfort women and then considers the legal and practical obstacles they faced in accessing justice at the end of the War. It outlines how towards the end of the 20th century the survivors broke their silence about these events and unsuccessfully sought justice through national and international mechanisms. The Women's Tribunal was created out of the failure to receive appropriate redress. From this particular example the article discusses more generally the concept of Peoples’ Tribunals in delivering justice (especially gender justice) and assesses whether such institutions of civil society have any legitimate and effective role in providing justice where none has been given by the state.

Suggested Citation

Chinkin, Christine, Peoples’ Tribunals: Legitimate or Rough Justice (2006). Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1816449

Christine Chinkin (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law School ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=cchinkin

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
658
PlumX Metrics