Sacrifice and Sacred Honor: Why the Constitution is a 'Suicide Pact'

126 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2011 Last revised: 27 Mar 2012

See all articles by Peter Bayer

Peter Bayer

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

Date Written: March 8, 2011

Abstract

Most legal scholars and elected officials embrace the popular cliché that "the Constitution is not a suicide pact." Typically, those commentators extol the “Constitution of necessity,” the supposition that Government, essentially the Executive, may take any action - may abridge or deny any fundamental right - to alleviate a serious national security threat. The Constitution of necessity is wrong. This article explains that strict devotion to the "fundamental fairness" principles of the Constitution’s Due Process Clauses is America’s utmost legal and moral duty, surpassing all other considerations, even safety, security and survival.

Analysis begins with the most basic premises: the definition of morality and why nations must be moral. This article defends Deontology, the philosophy that because they are a priori, moral principles must be obeyed regardless of terrible outcomes. Such is the sacrifice demanded by morality. As most theorists and politicians favor some form of Consequentialism (the theory that the moral answer is the one that produces the most happiness), the defense of pure Deontology is thorough. Next, this work links Deontology directly with the American Revolution by demonstrating that, undeniable political influences and compromises notwithstanding, the Founders were deontologists who asserted in the Declaration of Independence that government is legitimate only if it governs according to eternal moral precepts. They pledged the new Nation’s “sacred honor” to uphold steadfastly the principles of moral government.

Aware of their imperfectness, the Founders instructed their successors to improve the moral philosophy underlying the Declaration. The deontology of Immanuel Kant expresses the best general paradigm of morality. Kant famously explained that all persons and societies share an overarching moral duty to respect the innate dignity of every human being no matter what sacrifice that may entail. Kantian ethics clarifies why moral abidance is more important than life itself. Because it is the superior moral theory that the Founders sought, Kant’s “dignity principle” must delimit the Constitution which, as explicated herein, is the legal iteration of the Declaration.

This article’s concluding discussion of the Constitution, particularly due process precedents, explains why the Kantian approach - sacrifice and honor - debunks the Constitution of necessity, proving that the Constitution is a suicide pact.

Keywords: U.S. Constitution, suicide pact, deontology, consequentialism, Kant, due process, sacred honor

Suggested Citation

Bayer, Peter, Sacrifice and Sacred Honor: Why the Constitution is a 'Suicide Pact' (March 8, 2011). William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 20, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1816570

Peter Bayer (Contact Author)

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
702-895-2480 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
rank
306,556
Abstract Views
948
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information