Should the Government Be in the Banking Business? The Role of State-Owned and Development Banks
47 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2011
Date Written: November 2004
Abstract
This paper surveys the theoretical and empirical literature on the role of state-owned banks and also presents some new results and a robustness analysis. The paper shows that state-owned banks located in developing countries have fiscal costs because they are characterized by lower returns than comparable privately owned banks (on the other hand, there is no evidence that state-owned banks located in industrial countries are less profitable than their private counterparts). We then point out that this evidence cannot be used as an argument against the existence of state-owned banks, as this low profitability might stem from state-owned banks’ activity on projects characterized by low private sector investment and high social return. While we find no evidence that the presence of state-owned banks promotes economic growth or financial development, we also find that the evidence that state-owned banks lead to lower growth and financial development is not as strong as previously thought.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Bank Performance, Efficiency and Ownership in Transitition Countries
By John Bonin, Paul Wachtel, ...
-
Bank Ownership and Performance
By Alejandro Micco, Ugo Panizza, ...
-
By Allen N. Berger, George R. G. Clarke, ...
-
By David Grigorian and Vlad Manole
-
Why Privatize? The Case of Argentina's Public Provincial Banks
By Robert Cull and George R. G. Clarke
-
Privatization Matters: Bank Efficiency in Transition Countries
By John Bonin, Paul Wachtel, ...
-
Privatization Matters: Bank Efficiency in Transition Countries
By John Bonin, Paul Wachtel, ...
-
Privatization Matters: Bank Efficiency in Transition Countries
By John Bonin, Iftekhar Hasan, ...