On Foreign Participation and Hiring Patterns after Privatization
17 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2011
Date Written: March 2006
Abstract
Critics of globalization claim that foreign ownership of privatized firms is linked to negative post-privatization labor outcomes, such as more firing and less hiring. This paper uses new firm-level data for a cross section of countries to test this idea and provides evidence that foreign purchasers of state-owned enterprises tend to acquire firms that were already better restructured before privatization. Additionally, this paper does not find evidence that foreign participation in privatized firms is linked to negative labor outcomes.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization
-
Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey
By Simeon Djankov and Peter Murrell
-
Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey
By Simeon Djankov and Peter Murrell
-
Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?
By Bernard S. Black, Reinier Kraakman, ...
-
How Does Privatization Work? Evidence from the Russian Shops
By Nicholas Barberis, Maxim Boycko, ...
-
By Joseph P. H. Fan and T.j. Wong
-
By Enrico C. Perotti and Bruno Biais