Do Credit Rating Agencies Add Value? Evidence from the Sovereign Rating Business Institutions
48 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2011
Date Written: November 2008
Abstract
If rating agencies add no new information to markets, their actions are not a public policy concern. But as rating changes may be anticipated, testing whether ratings add value is not straightforward. This paper argues that ratings and spreads are both noisy signals of fundamentals and suggest ratings add value if, controlling for spreads, they help explain other variables. The paper additionally analyzes the different actions (ratings and outlooks) of the three leading agencies for sovereign debt, considering the differing effects of more or less anticipated events. The results are consistent across a wide range of tests. Ratings do matter and hence how the market for ratings functions may be a public policy concern.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Richard Cantor and Frank Packer
-
What Explains Changing Spreads on Emerging-Market Debt: Fundamentals or Market Sentiment?
By Barry Eichengreen and Ashoka Mody
-
The Evolution and Determinants of Emerging Market Credit Spreads in the 1990s
-
Ldc's Foreign Borrowing and Default Risk: an Empirical Investigation
-
The Evolution and Determinants of Emerging Markets Credit Spreads in the 1990s
-
Ldc Borrowing with Default Risk
By Jeffrey D. Sachs and Daniel Cohen
-
Determinants of Emerging Market Bond Spread: Do Economic Fundamentals Matter?
By Hong G. Min
-
By Barry Eichengreen and Ashoka Mody
-
By Barry Eichengreen and Ashoka Mody