Methodological Shortcomings in Estimating Armington Elasticities

22 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2011

See all articles by Adriana Cassoni

Adriana Cassoni

Universidad de la Republica

Manuel Flores

Departamento de Economía, Universidad de la República

Date Written: December 1, 2008

Abstract

CGEMs are one of the most potentially powerful tools for simulating policies. However, a major restriction they face is them needing a huge number of parameters that are not always available, and even at times impossible to obtain. When CGEMs are applied to trade, Armington elasticities of substitution are one of those key sets. The common practice among CGEMs builders has been to impose these values, either at will or by using those stemming from other existing research. There is general consensus, however, that econometrically estimated parameters for each case study would substantially improve the robustness of results. Unfortunately, most of the so obtained elasticities are considered underestimates of both the real and theoretically expected parameters. This gave rise to a growing concern on the eventual role played by methodological and empirical issues in this matter. There are some findings that have generated a quite general consensus among researchers, related to the type of datasets used; the disaggregation levels at which goods are defined and the origins of imported varieties are considered; the frequency of data; among others.

We here argue that many of these assessments, although mostly sensible, are not at all robust, as they are based on the exhaustive comparison of values that were, however, estimated using non comparable - and even statistically misspecified - econometric models. We focus on four particular issues: the spatial/temporal character of the datasets used; temporal frequency of the data; the aggregation level chosen to define a good; and the estimation methodologies used. We critically discuss the existing surveys and the papers therein reviewed, and use Uruguayan data as a means of testing for the validity of the different hypotheses.

Keywords: Armington Elasticities, Uruguay

JEL Classification: B40, F14, F17

Suggested Citation

Cassoni, Adriana and Flores, Manuel, Methodological Shortcomings in Estimating Armington Elasticities (December 1, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1821307 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1821307

Adriana Cassoni

Universidad de la Republica ( email )

Gonzalo Ramirez 1926
Montevideo, 11200
Uruguay

Manuel Flores (Contact Author)

Departamento de Economía, Universidad de la República ( email )

Facultad de Ciencias Sociales
Jose E. Rodo 1854
Montevideo 11200, 11200
Uruguay

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
47
Abstract Views
1,660
PlumX Metrics