After the Flood: The Legacy of the 'Surge' of Federal Immigration Appeals

Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, Winter 2011

Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 231

42 Pages Posted: 28 Apr 2011  

Stacy Caplow

Brooklyn Law School

Date Written: March 26, 2011

Abstract

For many years, the big news in United States Courts of Appeal was the skyrocketing immigration caseload. For Courts that traditionally had busy immigration dockets, the effect was tsunamic. One of those Circuits, the Second, instituted a nonargument calendar that, over the past five years, has enabled the Court to regain some control over its swollen docket. While this administrative strategy has rescued the Court from drowning, the flow of cases continues, somewhat abated, but with enduring force. The so-called surge had unanticipated consequences extending far beyond court management changes. As a result of their increased exposure to immigration cases at the hearing stage – reading transcripts and Immigration Judge decisions – federal judges increasingly found fault with immigration adjudication, criticizing the quality of both the judging and the lawyering. The glaring attention generated public reaction, forcing some reforms from the inside and continuing pressure from the outside. This paper examines the legacy of this exposure and its positive impact on the quest for better access to justice for immigrants facing removal.

Keywords: immigration, federal courts, immigration adjudication

Suggested Citation

Caplow, Stacy, After the Flood: The Legacy of the 'Surge' of Federal Immigration Appeals (March 26, 2011). Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, Winter 2011; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 231. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1824345

Stacy Caplow (Contact Author)

Brooklyn Law School ( email )

250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
116
Rank
196,472
Abstract Views
751