Why the Deisgn of Maturing Defined Benefit Plans Needs Rethinking
9 Pages Posted: 3 May 2011 Last revised: 3 Jun 2011
Date Written: June 1, 2011
Abstract
This article explains why and how maturing defined benefit pension plans become increasingly unstable if they maintain asset mix policies that embody material mismatch risk between plan assets and liabilities. An important feature of maturing defined benefit plans is that net positive cash flows (i.e. contributions exceed benefit payments) eventually turn negative as more money flows out of the plan to pay benefits to a rising number of retirees. Examples in the article demonstrate the implications of this new reality for funding ratio instability in defined benefit plans.
A consequence is that the design of defined benefit plans needs rethinking. On the one hand, traditional features such as benefit security and inflation protection remain important plan features. On the other, new elements such as pension contract fairness and completeness, as well as fair-value valuation disciplines for plan assets and liabilities must also become part of plan design.
Keywords: Complete Contracts, Defined Benefit Plans, Fair-Value, Pension Plan Design, Risk-Sharing
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Labor Supply Flexibility and Portfolio Choice in a Life-Cycle Model
By Zvi Bodie, Robert C. Merton, ...
-
Labor Supply Flexibility and Portfolio Choice
By Zvi Bodie and William F. Samuelson
-
Personal Investing: Advice, Theory, and Evidence from a Survey of Tiaa-Cref Participants
By Zvi Bodie and Dwight B. Crane
-
By James M. Poterba and David A. Wise
-
Life-Cycle Finance in Theory and in Practice
By Zvi Bodie
-
The Design and Production of New Retirement Savings Products
By Zvi Bodie and Dwight B. Crane
-
The Theory of Life-Cycle Saving and Investing
By Zvi Bodie, Jonathan Treussard, ...