Training the Nation’s Elite: National-Private Sector Differences in Japanese University Education
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 341-356, 2008
16 Pages Posted: 6 May 2011
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
I examine the relationship between university prestige and socioeconomic achievement in Japan. I generate a set of hypotheses based on human capital and screening models of education, and test these using a 1995 cross-sectional dataset. I find that university prestige significantly improves socioeconomic achievement among male university graduates in Japan. I also find that national university graduates have higher rates of return to their university education, and are more likely to be employed in higher prestige occupations than are private university graduates. My findings lend support to the ‘elite’ view of investments in human capital proposed by Becker (1993), under which higher ability individuals (in this case national university graduates) have more to gain from university education than do lower ability individuals. I find little support for the screening model of education.
Keywords: supply and demand for human capital, cost–benefit analysis, national–private sector differences, university quality
JEL Classification: I28, J24, J31, N35
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Value-Added Estimate of Higher Education Quality of U.S. States
By Lei Zhang
-
Is There a Premium for Elite College Education: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Japan
By Taejong Kim and Yoichi Okita
-
Do School Ties Matter?: Evidence from the Promotion of Public Prosecutors in Korea
By Taejong Kim