Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Transnational Law: An Essay in Definition with a Polemic Addendum

Occasional Paper of the Libertarian Alliance, Legal Notes, No. 52, London, U.K., 2011

16 Pages Posted: 7 May 2011 Last revised: 25 May 2011

Allen Mendenhall

Faulkner University Thomas Goode Jones School of Law

Date Written: May 6, 2011

Abstract

What is transnational law? Various procedures and theories have emanated from this slippery signifier, but in general academics and legal practitioners who use the term have settled on certain common meanings for it. My purpose in this article is not to disrupt but to clarify these meanings by turning to literary theory and criticism that regularly address transnationality. Cultural and postcolonial studies are the particular strains of literary theory and criticism to which I will attend. To review “transnational law,” examining its literary inertia and significations, is the objective of this article, which does not purport to settle the matter of denotation. Rather, this article is an essay in definition, a quest for etymological precision. Its take on transnationalism will rely not so much on works of literature (novels, plays, poems, drama, and so forth) but on works of literary theory and criticism. It will reference literary critics as wide-ranging as George Orwell, Kenneth Burke, and Edward Said. It will explore the “trans” prefix as a supplantation of the “post” prefix. The first section of this article, “Nationalism,” will examine the concept of nationalism that transnationalism replaced. A proper understanding of transnational law is not possible without a look at its most prominent antecedent. The first section, then, will not explore what transnationalism is; it will explore what transnationalism is not. The second section, “Transnationalism,” will piece together the assemblages of thought comprising transnationalist studies. This section will then narrow the subject of transnationalism to transnational law. Here I will attempt to squeeze several broad themes and ideals into comprehensible explanations, hopefully without oversimplifying; here also I will tighten our understanding of transitional law into something of a definition. Having tentatively defined transnational law, I will, in section three, “Against the New Imperialism,” address some critiques of capitalism by those cultural critics who celebrate the transnational turn in global law and politics. Although I share these critics’ enthusiasm for transnational law, I see capitalism - another hazy construct that will require further clarification - as a good thing, not as a repressive ideology that serves the wants and needs of the hegemonic or elite.

Keywords: transnational law, Marxism, Austrian Economics, Statism, Jurisdiction, Anarchism, Free Market, Literary Theory and Criticism, Libertarianism

Suggested Citation

Mendenhall, Allen, Transnational Law: An Essay in Definition with a Polemic Addendum (May 6, 2011). Occasional Paper of the Libertarian Alliance, Legal Notes, No. 52, London, U.K., 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1833498

Allen Mendenhall (Contact Author)

Faulkner University Thomas Goode Jones School of Law ( email )

The Blackstone Center for Law & Liberty
Faulkner Law, 5345 Atlanta Highway
Montgomery, AL United States of America 36109
United States
334-386-7495 (Phone)
334-386-7505 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://AllenMendenhall.com

Paper statistics

Downloads
148
Rank
166,548
Abstract Views
1,204