The Exclusion of Improperly Obtained Evidence in Greece: Putting Constitutional Rights First

International Journal of Evidence and Proof, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 181-212, 2007

32 Pages Posted: 9 May 2011

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

In contrast with England and Wales, where there is a discretion to exclude improperly obtained evidence, exclusion in Greece is automatic. Article 177 para. 2 of the Code of Penal Procedure mandates that evidence obtained by the commission of criminal offences is not taken into consideration. In addition, article 19 para. 3 of the Constitution prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of the right to privacy. Inspired by the rigidity of these exclusionary rules, the rights-centred approach that they reflect and the context of a constitutional criminal procedure within which they apply, this article sheds light on the protection of constitutional rights as a rationale for the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence. It does so against the background of the reliability-centred exclusionary doctrine in England.

Keywords: improperly obtained evidence, exclusionary rule, privacy, criminal procedure, comparative law

Suggested Citation

Giannoulopoulos, Dimitrios, The Exclusion of Improperly Obtained Evidence in Greece: Putting Constitutional Rights First (2007). International Journal of Evidence and Proof, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 181-212, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1835010

Dimitrios Giannoulopoulos (Contact Author)

Goldsmiths University of London ( email )

Deptford Town Hall building
New Cross
London, Lewisham UB10 8JJ
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
177
Abstract Views
1,528
Rank
370,416
PlumX Metrics