The Supreme Court of India's Practice of Referring Cases to Larger Benches: A Need for Review

Supreme Court Cases Journal, Vol. 1, p. 37, 2010

14 Pages Posted: 11 May 2011

See all articles by Chintan Chandrachud

Chintan Chandrachud

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

Date Written: February 1, 2010

Abstract

Every decision of the Supreme Court of India is treated as a ruling of the entire bench, even if there are one or more dissenting opinions. This fiction of law effectively implies that a nine-judge bench with four dissenting opinions is deemed to be a decision of nine judges, and would override even a unanimous verdict of seven judges. Notwithstanding the fact that the number of concurring views in the judgment of a larger bench is less than that of a smaller bench; the finding of the former prevails.

The issue which is sought to be examined in this article is why this peculiar practice prevails in India. The principle of referring matters to larger benches for reconsideration is neither theoretically nor practically sound. The corresponding systems in operation in several jurisdictions are examined as an index of comparison. The last section of this article sets out a blueprint for the Supreme Court of India which is more appropriate and feasible than the existing system.

Keywords: Supreme Court of India, larger benches

Suggested Citation

Chandrachud, Chintan, The Supreme Court of India's Practice of Referring Cases to Larger Benches: A Need for Review (February 1, 2010). Supreme Court Cases Journal, Vol. 1, p. 37, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1837484

Chintan Chandrachud (Contact Author)

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP ( email )

One Fleet Place
London, EC4M 7RA
United Kingdom
WC1V 6LJ (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
198
Abstract Views
878
rank
186,057
PlumX Metrics