Comparing Group and Individual Choices Under Risk and Ambiguity: An Experimental Study
26 Pages Posted: 10 May 2011 Last revised: 8 Sep 2011
Date Written: May 10, 2011
In this paper, we build on the emerging literature on group decision-making to study the so-called ‘group shift’ effect, i.e., groups are less risk-averse than individuals. Our study complements past research in two ways. First, we study the group shift effect under two sources of uncertainty, namely risk where probabilities are known, and ambiguity where probabilities are imprecise. Second, we study the impact of the group decision rule (unanimity and majority) on group shift. Results from a lottery-choice experiment show a general tendency for the group shift effect, regardless of the decision rule. The group shift effect, however, is found to be significant only under risk in the unanimity treatment. Our study hence provides a clear test of the effect of the decision rule on the group shift effect under both risk and ambiguity.
Keywords: collective decision, unanimity, majority, preferences, risk, ambiguity
JEL Classification: C91, C92
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
The Effect of Intergroup Competition on Group Coordination: An Experimental Study
By Gary Bornstein, Uri Gneezy, ...
Individual Behavior and Group Membership: Comment
Do Actions Speak Louder than Words? An Experimental Comparison of Observation and Cheap Talk
By John Duffy and Nick Feltovich
Are Four Heads Better than Two? An Experimental Beauty-Contest Game with Teams of Different Size
Group Polarization in the Team Dictator Game Reconsidered
By Wolfgang J. Luhan, Martin G. Kocher, ...
Individual and Group Decision Making Under Risk: An Experimental Study of Bayesian Updating and Violations of First-Order Stochastic Dominance
By Gary Charness, Edi Karni, ...
Individual Versus Group Behavior and the Role of the Decision Making Procedure in Gift-Exchange Experiments
By Martin G. Kocher and Matthias Sutter