13 Pages Posted: 20 May 2011
Date Written: June 2011
The efficacy of both frame-of-reference (FOR) instructions and a measure of within-person inconsistency in predicting grade point average was investigated. The IPIP Big Five personality questionnaire was given to 329 students with generic instructions and at school FOR instructions. The Wonderlic Personnel Test was also administered. A measure of within-person inconsistency was created based on the standard deviations of responses to items within the same Big Five dimension. The validity of conscientiousness was greater when FOR instructions were given. The measure of within-person inconsistency provided incremental validity over that of conscientiousness and cognitive ability. Additionally, within-person inconsistency moderated the relationship between conscientiousness and performance for the participants without the FOR instructions. Practical implications are discussed.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Reddock, Craig M. and Biderman, Michael D. and Nguyen, Nhung T., The Relationship of Reliability and Validity of Personality Tests to Frame-of-Reference Instructions and Within-Person Inconsistency (June 2011). International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 119-131, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1841242 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00540.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: j-2389.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.