Social Learning in Coordination Games: Does Status Matter?
13 Pages Posted: 17 May 2011
Date Written: September 1, 2007
Abstract
We report the results of experiments designed to test the impact of social status on learning in a coordination game. In the experiment, all subjects observe the play of an agent who either has high status or low status. In one treatment the agent is another player in the game; in the other the agent is a simulated player. Status is assigned within the experiment based on answers to a trivia quiz. The coordination game has two equilibria: one is payoff dominant but risky, and the other is risk-dominant. The latter is most commonly chosen in experiments where there is no coordination device.We find that a commonly observed agent enhances coordination on the payoff-dominant equilibrium more often when the agent has high status.
Keywords: Coordination Game, Payoff Dominance, Risk Dominance, Status
JEL Classification: C92, C7, Z13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Catherine C. Eckel, Sheryl B. Ball, ...
-
An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems
By Orley Ashenfelter, Janet Currie, ...
-
Buying Status: Experimental Evidence on Status in Negotiation
By Catherine C. Eckel and Sheryl B. Ball
-
By Bernardo A. Huberman, Christoph H. Loch, ...
-
Bargaining Efficiency and Screening: An Experimental Investigation
-
By Gary E. Bolton and Elena Katok
-
Does Competition Affect Giving? An Experimental Study
By John Duffy and Tatiana Kornienko
-
Social Approval, Competition, and Cooperation
By Xiaofei Pan and Daniel Houser
-
Reaching for the Stars: An Experimental Study of the Consumption Value of Social Approval
By Matthias Greiff and Fabian Paetzel