Download This PaperBrief of Amicus Curiae, Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-cv-01049-MHW (2010)
Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-CV01049-MHW, 2010
32 Pages Posted: 17 May 2011 Last revised: 31 Jul 2012
Date Written: May 16, 2011
Abstract
This amicus brief supports a bankruptcy court's order imposing sanctions on an attorney who, among other things, failed to appear at the debtor's confirmation hearing and encouraged the debtor to pay his fees by credit card prior to filing her petition.
Keywords: Milavetz, ethics, bankruptcy ethics, sanctions, bankruptcy court, district court, consumer bankruptcy, professional responsibility
JEL Classification: K1, K19, K39, K40, K41, K49
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Rapoport, Nancy B., Brief of Amicus Curiae, Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-cv-01049-MHW (2010) (May 16, 2011). Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-CV01049-MHW, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1843496
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.