Brief of Amicus Curiae, Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-cv-01049-MHW (2010)

Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-CV01049-MHW, 2010

32 Pages Posted: 17 May 2011 Last revised: 31 Jul 2012

Nancy B. Rapoport

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

Date Written: May 16, 2011

Abstract

This amicus brief supports a bankruptcy court's order imposing sanctions on an attorney who, among other things, failed to appear at the debtor's confirmation hearing and encouraged the debtor to pay his fees by credit card prior to filing her petition.

Keywords: Milavetz, ethics, bankruptcy ethics, sanctions, bankruptcy court, district court, consumer bankruptcy, professional responsibility

JEL Classification: K1, K19, K39, K40, K41, K49

Suggested Citation

Rapoport, Nancy B., Brief of Amicus Curiae, Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-cv-01049-MHW (2010) (May 16, 2011). Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-CV01049-MHW, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1843496

Nancy B. Rapoport (Contact Author)

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 S. Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154-1003
United States
713-202-1881 (Phone)
702-895-2482 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.unlv.edu

Paper statistics

Downloads
13
Abstract Views
304