Targeted Killing as a Means of Asymmetric Warfare: A Provocative View and Invitation to Debate
Law, Crime & History, Vol. 1, 2011
7 Pages Posted: 25 May 2011
Date Written: May, 17 2011
Abstract
The killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhou reportedly by agents of Israel’s Mossad service in Dubai a year ago serves as a quick reminder that extrajudicial executions, assassinations and other targeted killing operations are taking place and are part of a modern democracy’s arsenal of antiterrorism and counter-terrorism means. Targeted Killing Operations reportedly form part of NATO’s operational practice: depending on the circumstances they represent just another option of the lawful use of force in an armed conflict or assimilated situations. Consequently, it is argued that International Law does not impose an explicit ban on the lethal neutralization of certain persons in an armed conflict scenario.
Keywords: Targeted Killings, Hybrid War, Asymetric Warfare, Legality of Kinetic Operations, Law of Armed Conflict
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Paper statistics
Recommended Papers
-
By John Cerone
-
Triggering State Obligations Extraterritorially: The Spatial Test in Certain Human Rights Treaties
By Ralph Wilde
-
By Noam Lubell
-
The Jus Ad Bellum/Jus in Bello Distinction and the Law of Occupation
By Rotem Giladi
-
Playing by the Rules: Combating Al Qaeda within the Law of War
-
Rethinking the Divide between Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello in Warfare Against Nonstate Actors
