Re-Evaluating Suspect Classifications

67 Pages Posted: 22 May 2011

See all articles by Marcy Strauss

Marcy Strauss

Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Date Written: May 18, 2011

Abstract

In this article I argue that the factors commonly used to determine suspect status in equal protection jurisprudence (discrete and insular minority, political powerlessness, immutability, relevancy of trait and so forth) have been poorly defined by the courts despite over 50 years of consideration. The Supreme Court, as well as the lower courts, have not provided a coherent explanation for what factors trigger heightened scrutiny, creating a haphazard analytical framework where the boundary line between suspect and non-suspect classes is drawn imprecisely and inconsistently. The majority of the paper is devoted to trying to show that the factors have been poorly defined. In the conclusion, I briefly suggest some of the issues that should animate any future discussion about these factors.

Suggested Citation

Strauss, Marcy S., Re-Evaluating Suspect Classifications (May 18, 2011). Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 35, 2011, Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-16, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1845731

Marcy S. Strauss (Contact Author)

Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )

919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
(213)736-1077 (Phone)
(213) 380-3769 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
173
Abstract Views
1,007
Rank
354,554
PlumX Metrics