Coal Mine Safety: Do Unions Make a Difference?

40 Pages Posted: 20 May 2011 Last revised: 1 Dec 2013

Alison D. Morantz

Stanford University

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: May 29, 2012


Although the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) has always advocated strongly for miners’ safety, prior empirical literature contains no evidence that unionization reduced mine injuries or fatalities during the 1970s and ‘80s. This study uses a more comprehensive dataset and updated methodology to examine the relationship between unionization and underground, bituminous coal mine safety from 1993 to 2010. I find that unionization predicts a substantial and significant decline in traumatic injuries and fatalities, the two measures that I argue are the least prone to reporting bias. These disparities are especially pronounced among larger mines. My best estimates imply that overall, unionization is associated with a 13-30% drop in traumatic injuries and a 28-83% drop in fatalities. Yet unionization also predicts higher total and non-traumatic injuries, suggesting that injury reporting practices differ between union and nonunion mines.

Keywords: mine, mining, safety, MSHA, union, unions, coal, UMWA, reporting bias, injuries, fatalities

JEL Classification: D61,D63,I1, I10,I12,I18,I19,J00,J18,J28,J4,J5,J50,J51,J58,K00,K31,K32,L51,L71,L7,M54,M40,K23

Suggested Citation

Morantz, Alison D., Coal Mine Safety: Do Unions Make a Difference? (May 29, 2012). Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: or

Alison D. Morantz (Contact Author)

Stanford University ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Register to support our free research


Paper statistics

Abstract Views