The Hidden Legacy of Palsgraf: Modern Duty Law in Microcosm

W. Jonathan Cardi

Wake Forest University - School of Law


Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming
Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 1851316

The elements of the debate between Judges Cardozo and Andrews in Palsgraf are canonical: (1) What is the nature of duty — is it relational or act-centered?; (2) Is plaintiff-foreseeability a duty inquiry or an aspect of proximate cause?; (3) Is court or jury the proper arbiter of foreseeability? An exhaustive examination of the case law on these questions reveals a deep disconnect between what most of us learned in law school and what is playing out in modern courts. Close scrutiny of Palsgraf’s present-day incarnations also lends an invaluable birds-eye view of duty law, an area so rife with inconsistency and contradiction that it often bears more resemblance to constitutional law than the quintessential common-law doctrine that we expect from tort cases. This article melds the doctrinal with the theoretical. It is the first comprehensive survey of Palsgraf since Prosser’s Palsgraf Revisited, in 1953, and it is also a bottom-up inquiry into the “meaning” of duty in today’s courts. The most significant findings of the article are as follows: (1) Most courts have not bought into Cardozo’s relational view of duty — instead, courts are nearly unified in the view that duty is, at its core, a multi-factor policy analysis, although courts do not agree on the relevant factors; (2) Cardozo has overwhelmingly won the day on plaintiff-foreseeability’s place in duty versus proximate cause — a fact which contradicts Palsgraf’s common treatment in law school classrooms as well as the Restatement (Third) of Torts — although Cardozo’s directive that foreseeability is to be decided categorically has not been broadly adopted; and (3) In a bizarre twist, a majority of courts leave duty-foreseeability’s determination to the jury. This final discovery provides important insight into a hidden tension that has smoldered in courts’ negligence jurisprudence at least since Palsgraf was decided eighty-three years ago.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 27, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Cardi, W. Jonathan, The Hidden Legacy of Palsgraf: Modern Duty Law in Microcosm (2011). Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming; Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 1851316. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1851316

Contact Information

W. Jonathan Cardi (Contact Author)
Wake Forest University - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,143
Downloads: 317
Download Rank: 71,054