Footnotes (121)



The Courts are all a‘Twitter’: The Implications of Social Media Use in the Courts

Emily M. Janoski-Haehlen

Valparaiso University Law School

May 26, 2011

Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 46, 2011

Tweet, poke, post, friend, like, blog, link, comment, and share: the opportunities to communicate electronically using social media tools seem never ending. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, MySpace, and LinkedIn are just a few of the social media sites that allow people to communicate and “connect” with others across the world in seconds. E-mail and sending text messages are two other ways to communicate electronically, but neither e-mails nor text messages can keep up with the speed, accessibility, and popularity of social media. Social media is entrenched in our lives as evidenced by the fact that adult profiles on online social media sites are up from only 8% in 2005 to 47% in 2010. The legal profession has also jumped aboard the social media bandwagon with 40% of judges reporting they are on social media sites and 56% of attorneys reported having a presence on social media sites. Whichever “social networking” or communication method is chosen by an individual, the technology has made that communication instantaneous. Unfortunately, social media communication is also dangerous to the integrity of the courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: social media, social networking, twitter, Facebook, juror misconduct, jury instruction, judicial ethics, ethics

JEL Classification: K00, K10

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 28, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Janoski-Haehlen, Emily M., The Courts are all a‘Twitter’: The Implications of Social Media Use in the Courts (May 26, 2011). Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 46, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1853583

Contact Information

Emily M. Janoski-Haehlen (Contact Author)
Valparaiso University Law School ( email )
656 S. Greenwich St.
Valparaiso, IN 46383-6493
United States
219.465.7830 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,240
Downloads: 209
Download Rank: 115,174
Footnotes:  121
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Ensuring an Impartial Jury in the Age of Social Media
By Amy St. Eve and Michael Zuckerman