25 Pages Posted: 29 May 2011 Last revised: 11 Jun 2013
Date Written: May 27, 2011
Standard setters have sought a conceptual framework to guide development of a consistent set of accounting standards. However, the framework has two key weaknesses. First, it is very broad, lacks a measurement framework, and can be used ex post to justify a wide range of actual accounting standards. Second, all accounting issues are viewed as being conceptual issues. In many cases, we may need a good enough (even arbitrary) standard that coordinates our reporting choices, while at the same time trying to develop some systematic way of choosing measurement methods based on the cost and reliability of those measures.
We examine four key conceptual issues related to consistency that are at the heart of many financial reporting dilemmas: stocks and flows, ex-ante and ex post, conventions and economic substance, and evolution and design by standard setting bodies. Associated with each conceptual issue is an accounting duality; in some cases one side (e.g., stocks) is easier to measure in a reliable manner, while the other side (e.g., flows) is easier to measure in other instances. We suggest that financial reporting would benefit from a willingness to pay attention to both sides, and balance the reliability of measurement in specific issues (a local approach) with broad principles applied across many issues when possible (consistency).
Keywords: Conceptual Framework, Consistency, Verifiability, Conventions
JEL Classification: M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Biondi, Yuri and Glover, Jonathan C. and Jamal, Karim and Ohlson, James A. and Penman, Stephen H. and Sunder, Shyam and Tsujiyama, Eiko and Wilks, T. Jeffrey, Conceptual Issues in Financial Reporting (May 27, 2011). University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-686. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1854545 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1854545
By Ray Ball
By Mary Barth