JAMS Global Construction Solutions, p. 6, Spring 2011
5 Pages Posted: 31 May 2011
Date Written: May 31, 2011
This article describes how neutrals can provide early case management and resolution services to help parties in construction disputes resolve them more efficiently. Lawyers are often trapped in a “prison of fear” which locks them into unnecessarily long and expensive litigation. Although lawyers sometimes initiate early negotiation without engaging a third party to manage the process, sometimes a neutral may be necessary or extremely helpful. This article describes how neutrals can help lawyers and parties build an “escape hatch” from the prison of fear.
In contrast to the movement to “unbundle” lawyers’ services by offering clients the option to retain lawyers to perform selected services “à la carte,” this article recommends that neutrals offer to “bundle” a broad range of case management services. In addition to services related to the ultimate resolution of a case, neutrals can orchestrate good working relationships between counsel, exchange of information and documents specifically needed for the process, attendance of particular individuals, participation of experts, preparation of the parties, scheduling and logistics of the process, and documenting procedural agreements, as appropriate. Neutrals may be able to provide these services more economically than the parties’ lawyers, provide assurance that no one will gain unfair advantage from the procedural arrangements, and permit a fair allocation between the parties of the case management costs. The ideas in this article are adapted from my book, Lawyering with Planned Early Negotiation: How You Can Get Good Results for Clients and Make Money (ABA 2011).
Keywords: neutral, neutrals, case management, construction, negotiation, bundle, unbundle, prison of fear
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lande, John, How Neutrals Can Provide Early Case Management of Construction Disputes (May 31, 2011). JAMS Global Construction Solutions, p. 6, Spring 2011; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1856026