Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1857971
 
 

Footnotes (31)



 


 



The Limits of Neurolaw


Steven K. Erickson


affiliation not provided to SSRN

June 4, 2011

Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy, Vol. 11, 2012

Abstract:     
This brief essay is a response to Professor Lamparello‘s ambitious article in the forthcoming symposium collection in the Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. Professor Lamparello suggests that cognitive neuroscience might finally provide the criminal justice system with a reliable method of crime control. Unlike previous proposals under the fashionable neurolaw framework, Lamparello suggests that the value of the technology neuroscience brings to the table lies not in overturning the entrenched legal doctrine of mens rea or responsibility, but rather in its utilization to make predictions of future dangerousness. Those offenders who possess neurological abnormalities should be civilly committed after serving their prison sentences, according to Lamparello, just as many sexually violent predators are civilly committed today in light of the Kansas v. Hendricks and Kansas v. Crane. For reasons I discuss, I believe such policy prescriptions are unnecessary and unwise.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: neurolaw, criminal law, law and psychology, civil commitment


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 5, 2011 ; Last revised: June 14, 2011

Suggested Citation

Erickson, Steven K., The Limits of Neurolaw (June 4, 2011). Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy, Vol. 11, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1857971

Contact Information

Steven K. Erickson (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,375
Downloads: 236
Download Rank: 102,016
Footnotes:  31