Does Gender Affect Investors' Appetite for Risk? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending

32 Pages Posted: 6 Jun 2011

See all articles by Nataliya Barasinska

Nataliya Barasinska

German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin)

Date Written: May 1, 2011

Abstract

This study investigates the role of gender in financial risk-taking. Specifically, I ask whether female investors tend to fund less risky investment projects than males. To answer this question, I use real-life investment data collected at the largest German market for peer-to-peer lending. Investors' utility is assumed to be a function of the projects expected return and its standard deviation, whereas standard deviation serves as a measure of risk. Gender differences regarding the responses to projects' risk are tested by estimating a random parameter regression model that allows for variation of risk preferences across investors. Estimation results provide no evidence of gender differences in investors' risk propensity: On average, male and female investors respond similarly to the changes in the standard deviation of expected return. Moreover, no differences between male and female investors are found with respect to other characteristics of projects that may serve as a proxy for projects' risk. Significant gender differences in investors' tastes are found only with respect to preferred investment duration, purpose of investment project and borrowers' age.

Keywords: gender, investment choice, risk preferences

JEL Classification: G11, G21, J16

Suggested Citation

Barasinska, Nataliya, Does Gender Affect Investors' Appetite for Risk? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending (May 1, 2011). DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1125, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1858719 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1858719

Nataliya Barasinska (Contact Author)

German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) ( email )

Mohrenstraße 58
Berlin, 10117
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
324
Abstract Views
1,507
Rank
190,612
PlumX Metrics