Risky Curves: From Unobservable Utility to Observable Opportunity Sets
30 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2011 Last revised: 21 Jun 2011
Date Written: June 6, 2011
Abstract
Most theories of risky choice postulate that a decision maker maximizes the expectation of a Bernoulli (or utility or similar) function. We tour 60 years of empirical search and conclude that no such functions have yet been found that are useful for out-of-sample prediction. Nor do we find practical applications of Bernoulli functions in major risk-based industries such as finance, insurance and gambling. We sketch an alternative approach to modeling risky choice that focuses on potentially observable opportunities rather than on unobservable Bernoulli functions.
Keywords: expected utility, risk aversion, St. Petersburg Paradox, decisions under uncertainty, option theory
JEL Classification: C91, C93, D11, D81, G11, G12, G22, L83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Within-Subject Analysis of Other-Regarding Preferences
By Mariana Blanco, Dirk Engelmann, ...
-
Preferences and Beliefs in a Sequential Social Dilemma: A Within-Subjects Analysis
By Mariana Blanco, Dirk Engelmann, ...
-
Belief Elicitation in Experiments: Is There a Hedging Problem?
By Mariana Blanco, Dirk Engelmann, ...
-
Appendix for: Belief Elicitation in Experiments: Is There a Hedging Problem?
By Mariana Blanco, Dirk Engelmann, ...
-
Belief Elicitation in Experiments: Is There a Hedging Problem?
By Mariana Blanco, Dirk Engelmann, ...
-
Career Concerns Incentives: An Experimental Test
By Alexander K. Koch, Albrecht Morgenstern, ...
-
Inequity Aversion and Individual Behavior in Public Good Games: An Experimental Investigation
By Astrid Dannenberg, Thomas Riechmann, ...
-
By Guy Mayraz
-
Experimental Evidence on Inequity Aversion and Self-Selection between Incentive Contracts
-
Experimental Evidence on Inequity Aversion and Self-Selection Between Incentive Contracts