My Way: How Strategic Preferences Vary by Negotiator Role and Regulatory Focus
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1138-1142, 2010
Posted: 9 Jun 2011
Date Written: May 1, 2010
Negotiators may use vigilant, loss-minimizing strategies or eager, gain-maximizing strategies. The present study provides evidence that preferences for these different strategies depend on negotiator role and personal orientation. In a price negotiation, buyers and prevention-focused individuals prefer vigilant strategies whereas sellers and promotion-focused individuals prefer eager strategies. When there is a match between the strategy and the role (role-strategy fit) or between the strategy and the individual’s regulatory focus orientation (focus-strategy fit), the negotiator experiences more fit and plans to be more demanding in the negotiation. By manipulating strategy in a real, binding negotiation, we reveal its importance in determining negotiators’ subjective experiences and planned demand. Our results show that shared strategic preferences between different motivational orientations - negotiator role and personal regulatory focus - can create self-regulatory compatibility.
Keywords: Strategy, Negotiator Role, Regulatory Focus, Regulatory Fit
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation