Decertification of Police: An Alternative to Traditional Remedies for Police Misconduct

36 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2011  

Roger L. Goldman

Saint Louis University - School of Law

Steven Puro

Saint Louis University, Department of Political Science

Abstract

This article is the first in-depth examination of revocation of peace officer licenses for citizen abuse. Unlike the more familiar remedy of terminating the officer’s employment, license revocation, more commonly called decertification, has the advantage of disabling the officer from continuing to work in other departments within the state, just as occurs for myriad other professions and occupations. To determine what type of misconduct led to revocation, a file search was made of all revocations by the Florida Criminal Justices Standards and Training Commission during the time period October 1976 – October 1983. Florida was selected because it has been a national leader in decertification. Of the cases involving citizen abuse, the majority involved extorting money or sex in exchange for not arresting the citizen and demanding sex outright. None of the cases involved gathering evidence in violation of the Fourth Amendment and thus the exclusionary rule would not have come into play. The article concludes that it would therefore be inadvisable for the Supreme Court to rely on decertification as an effective remedy for Fourth Amendment violations.

Suggested Citation

Goldman, Roger L. and Puro, Steven, Decertification of Police: An Alternative to Traditional Remedies for Police Misconduct. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 45, 1987-1988. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1864641

Roger L. Goldman (Contact Author)

Saint Louis University - School of Law ( email )

100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63101
United States

Steven Puro

Saint Louis University, Department of Political Science ( email )

220 North Grand Boulevard
St. Louis, MO 63103
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Rank
237,891
Abstract Views
561