Mandated Severance Pay and Firing Cost Distortions: A Critical Review of the Evidence

57 Pages Posted: 20 Jun 2011  

Donald O. Parsons

George Washington University; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Abstract

Severance pay mandates are an appealing job displacement insurance strategy in developing countries, which have only modest government administrative capacities, but they carry the threat of adverse indirect effects. A critical review of the empirical literature reveals that severance benefit mandates, unaccompanied by other labor regulations, have little apparent impact on labor market behaviors. Indeed many severance mandates in the industrialized world do not greatly exceed those provided voluntarily in larger firms in the U.S. Benefit mandates in the developing world are sometimes more extravagant, and the absence of substantial effects may result from limited enforcement. Broader economic regulations do appear to have substantial, adverse effects on the labor market, but it is important not to equate these with simple severance insurance plans.

Keywords: severance pay, firing costs, hiring costs, separation rate, employment

JEL Classification: J08, J65, J33

Suggested Citation

Parsons, Donald O., Mandated Severance Pay and Firing Cost Distortions: A Critical Review of the Evidence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5776. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1867045

Donald O. Parsons (Contact Author)

George Washington University ( email )

1922 F Street NW
Old Main Suite 208
Washington, DC 20052
United States

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Schaumburg-Lippe-Str. 7 / 9
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
340