29 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2011
Date Written: July 2011
Despite a wealth of publications on compliance and noncompliance, regulation scholars still lack a consistent and comprehensive compliance theory and entertain a collection of partial and incompatible theories instead. This article is an attempt to improve this situation by taking up two interrelated challenges that compliance theorists are facing: to account for the multiple motivations behind compliance and noncompliance behaviors with one internally consistent framework and to account for the interactions between these motivations in other than an additive or ad hoc fashion. The article builds on Siegwart Lindenberg's Goal Framing Theory, which provides consistent accounts of the cumulated and interactive influence of heterogeneous motivations on decisions. The goal framing approach is illustrated with an extensive range of examples borrowed from the empirical literature on regulatory compliance. It thus provides a synthetic framework to account for different types of responses to regulation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Etienne, Julien, Compliance Theory: A Goal Framing Approach (July 2011). Law & Policy, Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 305-333, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1870726 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00340.x
By Chris Koski
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: j-9930.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.