Aggression as 'Organized Hypocrisy?' – How the War on Terrorism and Hybrid Threats Challenge the Nuremberg Legacy

The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice Vol 30 (1)

20 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2011 Last revised: 18 Oct 2012

See all articles by Sascha Dov Bachmann

Sascha Dov Bachmann

Bournemouth University - The Media School; Swedish Defence University (FHS); Bournemouth University

Gerhard Kemp

Stellenbosch University - Law

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

Modern threats to international peace and security from so called, "hybrid threats," such as cyber war, low intensity asymmetric conflict scenarios, global terrorism, etc., which involve a diverse and broad community of affected stakeholders involving both regional and international organisations/structures, also pose further questions for the existing legacy of Nuremberg. The (perhaps unsettling) question arises of whether our present concept of, "war and peace," with its legal pillars of the United Nations Charter’s Articles 2(4), 51, and the notion of the criminality of waging aggressive war based on the, "legacy," of Nuremberg has not become outdated to respond to new threats arising in the 21st century. This article also serves to warn that one should not use the definition of aggression, adopted at the ICC Review Conference in Kampala in 2010, to repeat the most fundamental flaw of Nuremberg: Ex post facto criminalisation of the (unlawful) use of force. A proper understanding of the, "legacy of Nuremberg," and a cautious reading of the text of the ICC definition of aggression provide some markers for purposes of the debate on the impact of new threats to peace and security and the use of force in international law and politics.

Keywords: Armed Conflict, Legality of the Use of Force, Nuremberg Principles, Hybrid Threats, Asymmetric Warfare, ICC Review Conference Kampala

Suggested Citation

Bachmann, Sascha-Dominik Oliver Vladimir and Kemp, Gerhard, Aggression as 'Organized Hypocrisy?' – How the War on Terrorism and Hybrid Threats Challenge the Nuremberg Legacy (2011). The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice Vol 30 (1) . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1871912 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1871912

Sascha-Dominik Oliver Vladimir Bachmann (Contact Author)

Bournemouth University - The Media School ( email )

Bournemouth, BH12 5BB
United Kingdom

Swedish Defence University (FHS) ( email )

114 28, Drottning Kristinas väg 37
Stockholm, 114 28
Sweden

HOME PAGE: http://https://bournemouth.academia.edu/SaschaDominikBachmann

Bournemouth University ( email )

Bournemouth, BH1
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://staffprofiles.bournemouth.ac.uk/display/sbachmann

Gerhard Kemp

Stellenbosch University - Law ( email )

South Africa

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
183
Abstract Views
983
rank
162,632
PlumX Metrics