Bribery as Negotiation: A Decision Making Perspective

44 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2011 Last revised: 14 Apr 2013

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 24, 2011

Abstract

The majority of research in conflict management focuses on conflict resolution: the process of reaching a mutually beneficial solution for the negotiating parties. However, some negotiations impart substantial negative externalities onto third parties, so "conflict resolution" is socially suboptimal. Bribery is one such example: potential bribe-givers and bribe-takers often have to negotiate on the price, speed and quality of services. The outcome of a “successful” negotiation may be a structurally unsound building, or a driver’s license issued to an incapable driver. The current paper examines bribery from a behavioral decision making perspective, zooming in on the economic and moral motivations of the negotiating parties and argues that the assignment of moral responsibility for bribery exchanges may play a significant role in the process. The lessons and policy suggestions stemming from this framework are compared and contrasted to the currently dominant approaches for controlling corruption: economic incentives and moral education.

Keywords: Bribery, Corruption, Bargaining, Negotiation, Ethical Decision Making

Suggested Citation

Atanasov, Pavel D., Bribery as Negotiation: A Decision Making Perspective (June 24, 2011). IACM 24TH Annual Conference Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1872132 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1872132

Pavel D. Atanasov (Contact Author)

Pytho LLC ( email )

866 President Street
Brooklyn, NY 11215
United States
7173335045 (Phone)
11215 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
150
Abstract Views
1,007
rank
91,226
PlumX Metrics