Quaderni DSE Working Paper No. 763
53 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2011
Date Written: June 22, 2011
It is still an open question when groups will perform better than individuals in intellectual tasks. We report that in a company takeover experiment, groups placed better bids than individuals and substantially reduced the winner’s curse. This improvement was mostly due to peer pressure over the minority opinion and to group learning. Learning took place from interacting and negotiating consensus with others, not simply from observing their bids. When there was disagreement within a group, what prevailed was not the best proposal but the one of the majority. Groups underperformed with respect to a “truth wins” benchmark although they outperformed individuals deciding in isolation.
Keywords: winner's curse, takeover game, group decision making, communication, experiments
JEL Classification: C91, C92, D03, D81
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Casari, Marco and Zhang, Jingjing and Jackson, Christine, When Do Groups Perform Better than Individuals? A Company Takeover Experiment (June 22, 2011). Quaderni DSE Working Paper No. 763. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1873267 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1873267