Freeing Migration from the State: Michael Trebilcock on Migration Policy

34 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2011 Last revised: 28 Jun 2011

See all articles by Audrey Macklin

Audrey Macklin

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Date Written: July 8, 2010

Abstract

The author explores Michael Trebilcock’s “The Law and Economics of Immigration Policy” as an opportunity to reflect on the capacity of broadly conceived, transnational policy prescriptions to contend with the complexity of migration as a global phenomenon, the specificity of national contexts, and the limits on state actors’ ability to socially engineer the character of present and future generations through immigrant selection. Trebilcock’s The Law and Economics of Immigration Policy sets out a broad prescriptive model for migration policy. It is informed by a classically liberal endorsement of free movement of labour, a commitment to efficiency, and a preference for market over state regulation. Trebilcock claims that his policy proposal will significantly liberalize immigration in prosperous liberal democratic states and be politically palatable. The key lies in pre-empting the objection that increased levels of immigration will impose or exacerbate the negative fiscal impact of immigrants on receiving states. Trebilcock would privatize selection by delegating it entirely to the market (employers) or the family (relatives), and institute a mandatory private insurance scheme payable by sponsors to insure against the risk that an immigrant will impose fiscal burdens on the state in the period leading up to eligibility for citizenship. While applauding the objective animating this proposal, the author relies partly on Ninette Kelley and Michael Trebilcock’s own historical/institutional immigration scholarship to challenge its viability. First, the author suggests that Trebilcock’s claim that his model is politically pragmatic is predicated on a contestable understanding of the nature of political opposition to immigration. Second, it is not obvious that Trebilcock’s model, taken on its own terms, would actually liberalize immigration across the range of states where he would seek to implement it. Finally, where the vast majority of immigrants are admitted on the basis of ascriptive kinship criteria, the author argues that family matters – and will continue to matter – in the future direction of immigration.

Keywords: immigration, temporary migration, fiscal impact, points system, family reunification

Suggested Citation

Macklin, Audrey, Freeing Migration from the State: Michael Trebilcock on Migration Policy (July 8, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1873536 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1873536

Audrey Macklin (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
416-946-7493 (Phone)
416-978-7899 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Abstract Views
643
rank
365,844
PlumX Metrics