The Death of Socio-Economic Rights

Modern Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 4, p. 532, 2011

23 Pages Posted: 5 Jul 2011 Last revised: 4 Oct 2014

See all articles by Paul O'Connell

Paul O'Connell

University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law

Date Written: July 4, 2011

Abstract

Over the last decade, apex courts in Canada, India, and South Africa – which have traditionally been viewed as socio-economic rights friendly – have issued judgments fundamentally at variance with the meaningful protection of socio-economic rights. This jurisprudential turn can be understood as part of a de facto harmonisation of constitutional rights protection in the era of neo-liberal globalisation. These national courts, although dealing with idiosyncratic domestic constitutional systems, have nonetheless begun to articulate analogous conceptions of fundamental rights which are atomistic, ‘market friendly’ and, more broadly, congruent with the narrow neo-liberal conception of rights, and consequently antithetical to the protection of socio-economic rights. This view of rights is becoming, well established as the hegemonic view and the pre-eminence of this view, taken with the entrenchment of neo-liberal policy prescriptions – and tacit judicial approval of such policies – signals the end, in substantive terms, for the prospect of meaningful protection of socio-economic rights.

Keywords: socio-economic rights, comparative constitutionalism, neo-liberalism, globalisation

Suggested Citation

O'Connell, Paul, The Death of Socio-Economic Rights (July 4, 2011). Modern Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 4, p. 532, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1878803

Paul O'Connell (Contact Author)

University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law ( email )

London, WC1H 0XG
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
239
Abstract Views
1,109
rank
143,488
PlumX Metrics