Rejoinder to Hoppe on Indifference

The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 52-59, 2009

8 Pages Posted: 7 Jul 2011

See all articles by Walter E. Block

Walter E. Block

Loyola University New Orleans - Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business

Date Written: July 5, 2011

Abstract

Hoppe (2005, p. 87) quite properly starts out his analysis of indifference with a magnificent quote from Rothbard (1997, pp. 225-226) on this subject:

Indifference can never be demonstrated by action. Quite the contrary. Every action necessarily signifies a choice, and every choice signifies a definite preference. Action specifically implies the contrary of indifference. . . . If a person is really indifferent between two alternatives, then he cannot and will not choose between them. Indifference is therefore never relevant for action and cannot be demonstrated in action.

I fully agree with Hoppe’s (2005, ibid.) assessment that “This seems to be undeniable, and any attempt to explain why one choses [sic] to do x rather than y with reference to indifference rather than preference strikes one as a logical absurdity, a ‘category mistake.’”

Suggested Citation

Block, Walter E., Rejoinder to Hoppe on Indifference (July 5, 2011). The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 52-59, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1879609

Walter E. Block (Contact Author)

Loyola University New Orleans - Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business ( email )

6363 St. Charles Avenue
Box 15, Miller 321
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
(504) 864-7944 (Phone)
(504) 864-7970 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
9
Abstract Views
146
PlumX Metrics