Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Confrontation Clause - Crawford/Davis/Melendez-Diaz: 2010 Application Summary - Recent Chaos

Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 46, p. 1334, 2010

18 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2011  

Michael H. Graham

University of Miami - School of Law

Date Written: August 2, 2010

Abstract

This article explores the state of confrontation clause analysis as it existed following the Melendez-Diaz United States Supreme Court 2009 decision that an forensic analyst’s affidavit that a substance is cocaine is “testimonial” as that term is presented and somewhat defined in Crawford and Davis. A then current “testimonial/nontestimonial application summary is incorporated followed by a contention that future confusion in the continuing saga of confrontation clause doctrine development is assured. This prediction was in fact borne out by the United States Supreme Court decisions in Bryant and Bullcoming, decisions that were penned after this article was published.

Suggested Citation

Graham, Michael H., Confrontation Clause - Crawford/Davis/Melendez-Diaz: 2010 Application Summary - Recent Chaos (August 2, 2010). Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 46, p. 1334, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1885755

Michael H. Graham (Contact Author)

University of Miami - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 248087
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
135
Rank
179,397
Abstract Views
627