Evolution Toward Neutrality: Evolution Disclaimers, Establishment Jurisprudence Confusions, and a Proposal of Untainted Fruits of a Poisonous Tree

47 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2011

See all articles by Asma Uddin

Asma Uddin

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: July 14, 2011

Abstract

This article deals with the controversy surrounding the teaching of evolutionary theory in American public schools with a specific focus on disclaimers read by teachers before they teach evolution. With the rise of religious fundamentalism and the correspondent change in the American socio-legal climate, questions of religion and interpretation of the Religion Clauses of the U.S. Constitution have become increasingly pertinent. In particular, the precise relationship between the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses is of special importance to religious groups that have become more vocal in their articulation of their free exercise rights.

The current disclaimer form either mentions specific religious theories about origins as alternatives to evolution or denigrates evolutionary theory in more indirect ways. Because such disclaimers are clearly antithetical to the neutrality concerns of the Establishment Clause, they have been held unconstitutional by all courts to date, including the December 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case in Dover, Pennsylvania. However, this article suggests that striking down the disclaimers without providing alternative responses to the legitimate free exercise concerns involved may violate the Free Exercise Clause. As a way of negotiating free exercise and establishment concerns, this article proposes a generalized disclaimer; one that does not single out evolutionary theory for special treatment, but rather addresses scientific inquiry as a whole. Generalized disclaimers neither discriminate among religions, between religion and non-religion, or between scientific theories. This article will then go on to discuss whether such generalized disclaimers can ever be constitutional, despite their origins in the evolution controversy. That is, are they poisoned by their roots, or can they be purged of this poison if they become sufficiently neutral in form? Lastly, this article concludes that the formally neutral generalized disclaimers should be upheld on constitutional grounds.

Keywords: Evolution, Evolutionary Theory

Suggested Citation

Uddin, Asma, Evolution Toward Neutrality: Evolution Disclaimers, Establishment Jurisprudence Confusions, and a Proposal of Untainted Fruits of a Poisonous Tree (July 14, 2011). Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 8, No. 2, Spring 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1885772

Asma Uddin (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
269
PlumX Metrics