32 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2011
In this article, we combine two sources of data to shed light on the nature of transactional legal work. The first consists of stories about contracts that circulate widely among elite transactional lawyers. Surprisingly, the stories portray lawyers as ineffective market actors who are uninterested in designing superior contracts, who follow rather than lead industry standards, and who depend on governments and other outside actors to spur innovation and correct mistakes. We juxtapose these stories against a dataset of sovereign bond contracts produced by these same lawyers. While the stories suggest that lawyers do not compete or design innovative contracts, their contracts suggest the contrary. The contracts, in fact, are entirely consistent with a market narrative in which lawyers engage in substantial innovation despite constraints inherent in sovereign debt legal work. This raises a puzzle: Why would lawyers favor stories that paint them in a negative light and deny them a potent role as market actors? We conclude with some conjectures as to why this might be so.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Weidemaier, Mark C. and Gulati, G. Mitu, How Markets Work: The Lawyer's Version. UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1886435. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1886435 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1886435