Print or Perish? Authors’ Attitudes Toward Electronic-Only Publication of Law Journals

19 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2011  

Richard A. Danner

Duke University School of Law

Kiril Kolev

Hendrix College

Marguerite Most

Duke University School of Law

Date Written: July 15, 2011

Abstract

An increasing number of U.S. law journals post at least current issues in freely accessible PDF and (in some cases) HTML formats on their websites. Yet, perhaps without exception, the journals that make their articles freely available on their websites also continue to publish print issues in the face of declining subscription numbers, and law libraries’ growing disinterest in collecting and preserving journals in print. As universities reduce staff, freeze open positions, eliminate salary increases, and cut library budgets, why have law schools continued to subsidize print publication of journals that are accessible in electronic formats? Among the reasons suggested for this is the possible impact of electronic-only publishing on a journal’s reputation and ability to attract authors. This paper reports on the results of a survey of law journal authors’ attitudes toward electronic-only law journals.

Keywords: Legal Scholarship, Law Journals, Legal Information

Suggested Citation

Danner, Richard A. and Kolev, Kiril and Most, Marguerite, Print or Perish? Authors’ Attitudes Toward Electronic-Only Publication of Law Journals (July 15, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1886445 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1886445

Richard A. Danner (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

Box 90361
Durham, NC 27708
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.duke.edu/fac/danner/

Kiril Kolev

Hendrix College ( email )

Conway, AR 72032
United States

Marguerite I. Most

Duke University School of Law ( email )

210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
267
Rank
93,119
Abstract Views
2,813